Lecture explores the good and bad
Eric McGuinness
The Hamilton Spectator
(Feb 11, 2008)
Russian President Vladimir Putin is calling
for his country to spend more on nanotechnology research for
weapons development, leaving no doubt that science of the
supersmall has the potential for harm as well as good.
But there are other risks as well, according
to McMaster University's John Preston.
The engineering physics professor can't be anything
but a booster of the technology -- he's leader of the McMaster
Initiative in Nanoinnovation -- and talks enthusiastically
about developing new tools to treat cancer, better ways to
generate energy and a range of new manufactured products.
At the same time, however, he notes that materials
act differently and may become dangerous at nanoscale, measured
in billionths of a metre. Aluminum in a pop can seems harmless,
but chop it finely enough and it will react violently with
oxygen and ignite explosively.
Others worry that carbon nanotubes already being
used in tennis rackets and bikes might prove toxic to factory
workers, that particles so small can cross the blood-brain
barrier that normally protects the brain from toxic particles.
Preston will address the good-news, bad-news
aspects of nanotechnology in a public lecture tomorrow titled
the Promise and Perils of Nanotechnology, one of the Science
in the City series co-sponsored by the university and The
Hamilton Spectator.
Interviewed in advance, he said: "It's
important the public understand better what's happening and
the speed at which it's happening. There's a funny sense among
some of us (in the field) that public/ government/society
should be thinking, should be more worried, about this than
they are. They're trusting us an awful lot.
"At the same time, there's nothing to be
horribly afraid of, but nonetheless, we should be thinking
about this stuff. It's real and it's coming up fast."
Nanotechnology, he explained, is bringing chemists,
mechanical engineers, physicists and specialists in other
disciplines together, but government regulators responsible
for workplace safety and environmental protection still work
separately.
"There's a division between environment
and occupational health, and some people believe nanotechnology
messes that up, that you need a more holistic view. The system
we have cobbled together works pretty well now, but there
are people talking about how to restructure it, and do you
need to restructure. Certainly there needs to be enhanced
communication."
NEED TO KNOW
Promise and Perils of Nanotechnology, by Professor
John Preston
WHEN: Doors open 6:30 p.m., tomorrow. Lecture
at 7 p.m.
WHERE: Hamilton Spectator Auditorium, 44 Frid
St., Hamilton
RESERVATIONS: 905-525-9140, ext. 24934, or e-mail
sciencecity@mcmaster.ca
emcguinness@thespec.com
905-526-4650