McMaster University

Search

Explore


Alison Sills Brian McCarry, speaking April 12 at The Spec auditorium, says car emissions have improved but we're driving more cars longer distances. (Photo credit Gary Yokoyama, The Hamilton Spectator)

The following article is reprinted courtesy of the Hamilton Spectator, McMaster University’s partner in the Science in the City Lecture Series.

Apr. 11, 12:43 EDT

Choices and air pollution
McMaster's chemistry chair says our lifestyle is mainly responsible for smog
Wade Hemsworth
The Hamilton Spectator

The truth is that there is no simple solution for cleaning the air we breathe and no single action or body can bring it back.

But Brian McCarry, an authority on air pollution and chair of McMaster University's chemistry department, remains optimistic that a co-ordinated and concentrated effort by everyone can do quite a bit to take the harmful chemicals, gases and particles out of the air around us.

"Air quality is with us. It's not going to go away," he said in an interview. "It's impacting folks and there are things you can do to make differences, but it's going to be everybody pulling together. It's not going to be one thing that does everything."

Government legislation and policies can take us part of the way and industrial and commercial practices can generate improvements. But individual choices from when to drive, how far to turn up the heat, what we buy and consume and even how we vote will take us the rest of the way, he said.

"My message is this: that it's our lifestyle that's driving the poor air quality, primarily. It's what we do and what we choose to do. It's the cars we buy, the decisions we make about how to build our cities."

As a graduate student at Stanford University in California, McCarry, now 58, often visited Los Angeles before pollution controls became standard equipment on cars. The legendary smog -- most of it caused by cars and trucks -- was so thick it was possible to see the stoplight on the next block, but not the one on the block after that.

He remembers hearing about a visiting scholar from Japan who rode his bike to work in Pasadena every day for six months, right under Mount Baldy. It's a peak of 10,000 feet, but the visitor hadn't realized there was a mountain there at all until the smog finally cleared enough for him to see it.

Starting in the late 1960s, legislation controlling automotive emissions forced the industry to make massive changes to the way it built cars. While few would call the air in Los Angeles perfect today, all would agree that it has improved dramatically. And the transformation gives hope to McCarry, who will speak tomorrow as part of the Science in the City lecture series at The Hamilton Spectator's auditorium on Frid Street.

   

 

The professor is chair of Clean Air Hamilton, a volunteer body composed of elected officials, industrialists, academics and environment advocates. He said some might be surprised to know they are all "singing the same song," as they work to reduce air pollution in and from Hamilton.

"We're all concerned about air quality. We've all come to the same conclusions. We've all seen the same data. We've all seen the same trends and we've come to pretty much the same conclusions. We've realized there's no silver bullet. There's no one thing. People are always looking for the one thing that will work."

Despite persistent perceptions to the contrary, the air in Hamilton is not markedly different from that in similar cities across the continent, McCarry said. Still, that is not necessarily good news. Weather patterns send us air from the industrial Ohio Valley in the U.S. We add our own industrial, residential and vehicular emissions to it before sending it along to the countryside, creating poor air quality in Algonquin Park, Parry Sound and other picturesque areas where one might expect to find more pristine air.

Industrial air pollution, he said, has generally flattened, while the pollution created by people in their everyday lives continues to climb.

While better technology has led to cleaner automotive emissions, we have cancelled its effects by driving more cars more often and over longer distances, said McCarry, who holds the Stephen A. Jarislowsky chair in Environment and Health at McMaster, where he has taught for 28 years.

A few years ago, McCarry and other researchers proved that toxic compounds in the air, in addition to posing a considerable hazard to human health, also accumulate on the hard surfaces that make up cities. The toxic film that forms on man-made urban surfaces such as asphalt, metal, glass and concrete, builds up until rain washes it into sewers and creeks, forming a poisonous broth that spreads the harmful effects farther still.

It's a phenomenon McCarry and the researchers confirmed simply by washing windows and analyzing the water they collected. "We know that all the contaminants you can name and there's a very, very long list of them -- PCBs, organo-chlorines, polycyclic aromatics -- they're all there in the film and the rain washes it off."

McCarry is a plain-speaking scientist who uses words like "goo" to make it easier to understand complicated concepts.

"It's going to be, I think, a very understandable lecture," he said. "When I've put things together for city hall and have talked down there and shown them data, the councillors down there can understand me. If they can, I think most folk can," he said with a chuckle.

The free lecture is open to the public and starts at 7 p.m. Seats can be reserved by e-mail at sciencecity@mcmaster.ca
or by voice mail at 905-525-9140 extension 24934

whemsworth@thespec.com

905-526-3254

 

 

 

 
 
Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy