|
Approved
by Senate, October 10, 2001
Approved
by Board of Governors, October 25, 2001
DISCLAIMER: If there is a discrepancy between this electronic policy and the written copy held by the Policy owner, the written copy prevails.TABLE OF CONTENTS
Where
applicable, this policy should be read in conjunction with McMaster University's
Statement on Academic Freedom (Appendix A)
An academic
and free community must also include freedom of movement and freedom of
access to facilities and resources without fear of harassment, discrimination
or violence.
Such
other harassing behaviours may involve one incident or a series of incidents.
The following list of examples, while not exhaustive, may constitute sexual
harassment depending on the context in which the incident(s) take place,
the frequency and severity of the incidents and whether it is known, or
ought reasonably to have been known, that the conduct was unwanted:
This
may involve the making of special arrangements, two examples of which are
described below.
In the
event that the actual case is not referred to the Sexual Harassment Officer,
the individual responsible for the case shall adhere as closely as possible
to the policies and procedures of this document. If a complainant chooses
not to consult the Officer, but wishes a formal hearing, the complainant
shall be directed to file a written request with the Secretary of the Board
of Governors.
The notes/records in (a), (b) and (c) above shall be maintained by the Sexual Harassment Officer. No one other than the Sexual Harassment Officer shall have access to the records in (a) and (b) above, except as otherwise provided for in this policy.
In cases
the Officer deems to be appropriate, the Officer, or a suitably trained
alternate appointed by the Officer, may investigate allegations made under
this policy in order to:
In the
event that the tribunal cannot reach a majority decision with respect to
the recommended penalty, the two members of the tribunal who do not occupy
the position of Chair shall each submit in writing to the Chair the penalty
he or she believes is appropriate. The Chair shall select one of these
two proposals as the tribunal decision.