|
Joint
Intellectual Property Policy
|
Approved
by: University Senate, June 9, 2004
University Board of Governors, June 10, 2004
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, June 22, 2004
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, June 17, 2004
| DISCLAIMER: |
If there
is a discrepancy between this electronic policy and the written copy held
by the Policy owner, the written copy prevails. |
1. Introduction and Objectives
| 1.1
|
The purpose of McMaster University
(hereinafter the “University”), Hamilton Health Sciences (“HHS”) and St.
Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (“SJHH”) includes the discovery, communication,
and preservation of knowledge. The vision of the University, HHS and SJHH
includes the achievement of international distinction for creativity, innovation
and excellence. |
1.2
|
Discoveries are an objective of
the University, HHS and SJHH (collectively the “Institutions”). As a part
of their obligation to society in general, the Institutions and their members
have a responsibility to communicate these discoveries to the public. Some
of these discoveries may have commercial value which should be exploited
to the mutual advantage of those concerned. If the use of these discoveries
can be limited or controlled by physical or legal means, the discoveries
may also be referred to as “intellectual property.” |
| 1.3 |
The objectives of this policy are
to: |
| (a) |
encourage any member of the Institutions
who may have created or discovered intellectual property to disseminate
that property to the public in a manner that benefits both the member and
the Institutions; |
| (b) |
recognize and uphold the principles
of academic and research integrity in the possible commercialization of
intellectual property; |
| (c) |
develop a body of knowledge and
expertise within the Institutions in order to permit the continued successful
commercialization of intellectual property in the future; |
| (d) |
outline clearly the ownership rights
in any newly created or discovered intellectual property as between the
Institutions and their members and the obligation for related costs and
the division of related revenues; |
| (e) |
provide for the rights and obligations
of the Institutions and their members in protecting and exploiting any
newly created or discovered intellectual property; |
| (f) |
provide exclusions for certain types
of intellectual property from this policy; and |
| (g) |
provide for the rights and
obligations of the Institutions among themselves for the responsibilities
and benefits arising under this policy. |
| 1.4
|
It is possible that, at times,
the academic and research missions of the Institutions may conflict with
the potential commercialization of intellectual property. As the academic
and research missions of the Institutions should take priority, the following
principles shall take precedence over any other aspect of this policy where
applicable: |
(a)
|
Academic Researchers, as defined
in section 2.1, have the right initially to determine whether or not any
new creation or discovery for which they are responsible should be commercialized.
Prior to making such a decision, the Institutions may be asked to review
any such creation or discovery and provide advice on the possible commercial
value thereof. In spite of such a review, the Academic Researcher shall
be solely responsible for the decision to proceed with commercialization; |
(b)
|
Members of the Institutions who
are involved in the commercialization of any creation or discovery may
be asked to withhold publication of any material or not to make any presentation
thereof only for a reasonable period of time not exceeding six (6) months
from the time full disclosure is made. This period of time shall be used
to assess the intellectual property and to allow for any applicable legal
protection to be put into place; |
| (c) |
No member of the Institutions shall
be required to engage in any work or research which prohibits the results
of the work or research from publication or disclosure to the public unless: |
| (i) |
that person is engaged in a position
where it is contemplated that they would not normally be expected to publish
the result of their work or research; or |
| (ii)
|
that person provides their informed
consent to engage in such work or research, and, in the case of any Student,
their involvement in the work or research does not conflict or jeopardize
the timely completion of any academic requirements and that the Institutional
Student Affairs Office, as that term is defined in section 2.4 below, has
agreed to such participation. |
2. Definitions
In this policy, the following terms, when capitalized, shall have the following
meanings:
| 2.1
|
“Academic Researcher” means someone
who is a Member of the Institutions and whose appointment contemplates
that they will conduct research and be responsible for the publication
or other dissemination of the results of that research or be responsible
for teaching of Students. For greater certainty and without limitation,
an Academic Researcher shall include: |
| (a) |
a member of the University Teaching
Staff; and |
| (b) |
someone who holds an appointment
to the medical staff of SJHH or HHS; and shall not include: |
| (c) |
a research technician; |
| (d) |
a research nurse; or |
| (e) |
any other staff member who works
under the direct supervision of an Academic Researcher. |
The determination of who is an Academic Researcher shall be the responsibility
of the IP Board;
| 2.2 |
“Disclosure Form” means the form
established under section 7 hereof; |
| 2.3 |
“HHS” means Hamilton Health Sciences
Corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario. |
2.4
|
“Institutional Student Affairs Office”
means the office of the institution (which may include institutions such
as hospitals, universities and community colleges other than SJHH, HHS
and the University) that is responsible for the academic progress of a
student. For a University Student that is enrolled in a graduate program
it is the School of Graduate Studies; for a University Student that is
enrolled in an undergraduate program it is the Dean’s office of the relevant
Faculty. The determination of which is the correct office shall be the
responsibility of the IP Board; |
| 2.5 |
The “IP Board” means the Joint Institutional
Intellectual Property Board created herein and comprises the membership
described in section 3.5; |
| 2.6 |
“IP Creator” has the meaning defined
in section 5.1 hereof; |
2.7
|
"Intellectual Property” means databases,
audio-visual material, electronic circuitry, biotechnology and genetic
engineering products, computer software recorded in any format, inventions,
discoveries and all other products of research (which inventions, discoveries
or other products are capable of protection pursuant to any law of Canada
or any other country or which may be otherwise licensable) where any of
the foregoing are created, whether by discovery, invention or otherwise
by an IP Creator as hereinafter defined; |
| 2.8 |
"Member of an Institution” or “Member
of the Institutions” or any similar phrase means anyone who: |
| (a) |
holds any appointment as a member
of the medical staff of any of the Institutions; |
| (b) |
is a member of the University Teaching
Staff’ |
| (c) |
is an employee of any type of any
of the Institutions; |
| (d) |
holds any other type of office or
privileges at any of the Institutions; or |
| (e) |
is a Student at any of the Institutions. |
| 2.9 |
“ORCIP” means the Office of Research
Contracts & Intellectual Property of the University; |
| 2.10 |
“SJHH” means St. Joseph’s Healthcare
Hamilton, a division of the St. Joseph’s Health System; |
| 2.11 |
“Student” includes: |
| (a) |
a University Student; |
| (b) |
a person following a program at
any of the Institutions as a Post-Doctoral Fellow, Clinical Fellow, Medical
Intern or Medical Resident; and |
| (c) |
anyone else who is engaged in a
course of study at any of the Institutions or at any other institution
(which may include institutions such as hospitals, universities and community
colleges other than the Institutions). |
The determination of who is a Student shall be the responsibility of the
IP Board;
| 2.12 |
the “University” means McMaster
University created under the McMaster University Act, 1976; |
| 2.13 |
“University Student” has the same
meaning as the term “student” is defined in the McMaster University Act,
1976; |
| 2.14 |
“University Teaching Staff” has
the same meaning as the term “teaching staff” is defined in the McMaster
University Act, 1976; |
3. Responsibility for this Policy
| 3.1 |
ORCIP is responsible for providing
the administrative needs of this policy. |
| 3.2 |
The Executive Director of the ORCIP
is responsible for the administration of this policy and shall be responsible
to the Vice-President (Research and International Affairs) of the University |
| 3.3
|
The Vice-President (Research and
International Affairs) of the University shall consult as necessary with
the Vice-President Research and Corporate Development of HHS and the Vice-President
Research of SJHH on the operations of the ORCIP (the three Vice-Presidents
being the “Institutional Vice-Presidents”). |
| 3.4 |
The Intellectual Property Board
of the University existing at January 1, 2005, is continued as the Joint
Institutional Intellectual Property Board. |
| 3.5 |
The Joint Institutional Intellectual
Property Board shall consist of the following members: |
| (a) |
Vice-President (Research & International
Affairs) of the University, who shall act as Chair of the Board; |
| (b) |
Vice-President, Research and Corporate
Development of HHS, who shall act as a vice-Chair of the Board; |
| (c) |
Vice-President, Research of SJHH,
who shall act as a vice-Chair of the Board; |
| (d) |
The Executive Director of the ORCIP,
who shall act as Secretary of the IP Board; |
| (e) |
Five (5) members of the University
Teaching Staff appointed by the President of the University, after consultation
with the Vice-President (Research & International Affairs) and the
President of the McMaster University Faculty Association; |
| (f) |
Three (3) other persons who have
experience in the commercialization of intellectual property appointed
by the Board of Governors of the University on the recommendation of the
President of the University; |
| (g) |
Two Academic Researchers of HHS
appointed by the President of HHS, after consultation with the Vice-President,
Research and Corporate Development of HHS; |
| (h) |
One (1) other person who has experience
in the commercialization of intellectual property appointed by the Board
of Directors of HHS on the recommendation of the President of HHS; |
| (i) |
Two Academic Researchers of SJHH
appointed by the President of SJHH, after consultation with the Vice-President,
Research of SJHH; |
| (j) |
One (1) other person who has experience
in the commercialization of intellectual property appointed by the Board
of Trustees of SJHH on the recommendation of the President of SJHH. |
Terms for those described in paragraphs(e) through (j) above shall be for
a term of up to three (3) years which may be extended for no more than
two (2) additional terms.
| 3.6
|
The IP Board shall from time to
time establish its own rules of procedure which shall be consistent with
practices within the Institutions. Such rules shall also provide that when
the IP Board is acting in a quasi-judicial fashion in making decisions
that rules of natural justice shall be applied. |
| 3.7 |
Quorum of the IP Board shall be
a simple majority thereof provided that there shall be at least two members
present from an Institution when dealing with any matters arising from
that Institution. |
| 3.8 |
The duties of the IP Board shall
include: |
| (a) |
the specific decisions referred
to in sections 2.1, 2.4,2.11, 3.6, 4.3(d), 4.4, 6.4, 6.6, 7.1, 11.2, 14.4,
14.8, 15.2 and 16 hereof; |
| (b) |
preparing an annual report to the
Senate and Board of Governors of the University, the Board of Directors
of HHS and the Board of Trustees of SJHH on intellectual property and its
commercialization; |
| (c) |
the recommendation to the Senate
and the Board of Governors of the University, the Board of Directors of
HHS and the Board of Trustees of SJHH of any revisions required to this
or any other Institutional Policy relating to intellectual property; |
| (d) |
the resolution of issues of disputed
discovery among two or more IP Creators of the same intellectual property,
the entitlement to any portion of Net Revenues of any IP Creator or the
division of Net Revenues as between IP Creators; and |
| (e)
|
the resolution of any other issues
relating to the commercialization of intellectual property at the Institutions
including, without limitation, the decision whether or not to proceed with
commercialization in the case of joint IP Creators where there is no unanimous
agreement among them as to commercialization. |
| 3.9 |
The IP Board has exclusive jurisdiction
over the application, interpretation and administration of this policy.
Any claim made by any IP Creator or anyone making any claim hereunder shall
be submitted to the IP Board for final determination. |
| 3.10
|
Every order, decision or proceeding
of the IP Board is final and shall not be questioned, reviewed, prohibited
or restrained by any court or be made the subject of any proceedings in
or any process of any court, whether by way of injunction or certiorari
or otherwise on any ground, including the ground that the order, decision
or proceeding is beyond the jurisdiction of the IP Board. |
4. Intellectual Property Covered by this Policy
| 4.1 |
Intellectual Property has the meaning
defined in section 2.7 hereof. |
| 4.2 |
In the case of members of the Institutions
who are not Academic Researchers, Intellectual Property shall include anything
created or discovered by them when the terms of their employment require
them to engage in the activity that resulted in the creation or discovery; |
| 4.3 |
Intellectual Property shall
not include: |
(a)
|
copyright in traditional academic
materials such as, without limitation, lecture notes, laboratory manuals,
articles, books, artifacts, works of visual art, maps, charts, plans, photographs,
engravings, sculptures and music, no matter in which format any of the
foregoing materials may have been recorded or embodied including, without
limitation, a computer readable format, where any of the foregoing material
has been created by someone who is an Academic Researcher unless they have
otherwise agreed to treat any such material as Intellectual Property hereunder; |
| (b) |
computer software that is either
ancillary to or the functional equivalent of any of the items described
in paragraph (a) hereof where such material has been created by someone
who is an Academic Researcher; |
| (c) |
anything created or discovered by
a member of the Institutions in the course of demonstrably private research
outside of their normal Institutional duties or in the course of activities
as a consultant to outside persons when such consulting activities otherwise
comply with applicable Institutional policies on such activities and have
been properly reported as required by those policies; |
| (d) |
provided that there has not been
a significant use of Institutional resources (the level of which shall
be determined by the IP Board) and provided that the work otherwise complies
with applicable Institutional policies, anything independently created
or discovered by a Student as part of the academic requirements of a program
or course of study; or |
| (e) |
any material which is in the public
domain. |
| 4.4 |
Any member of the Institutions can
seek a binding opinion from the IP Board as to whether or not any particular
matter is or is not Intellectual Property within the scope of this policy. |
5. Persons Covered by this Policy
| 5.1 |
In this policy, the term "IP Creator"
means an individual who: |
| (a) |
creates or discovers any Intellectual
Property; and |
| (b) |
is any one of: |
| (i) |
a member of any of the Institutions;
or |
| (ii) |
a person who is permitted to use
any facilities of any of the Institutions in a manner which is normally
not available to a member of the general public except on special request. |
| 5.2 |
Acceptance of the terms and conditions
of this policy shall be a condition of appointment, employment, enrolment,
or use as the case may be, of: |
| (a) |
every member of any of the Institutions;
and |
| (b) |
every person who is permitted to
use any facilities of any of the Institutions in a manner which is normally
not available to a member of the general public except on special request. |
| 5.3 |
This policy shall come into force
on January 1, 2005. All matters related to Intellectual Property at any
of the Institutions shall be governed by this policy after this date. |
6. Decision to Commercialize
| 6.1 |
An IP Creator who is an Academic
Researcher may make the decision to commercialize any newly created or
discovered Intellectual Property. The decision and the disclosure of the
creation or discovery must be made and communicated to the Institutions
at least six (6) months prior to any publication or presentation that would
have the effect of putting the new Intellectual Property in the public
domain. |
| 6.2
|
In the event that a decision to
commercialize any newly created or discovered Intellectual Property has
the effect of requiring any Student to be delayed in the presentation of
any material required for the successful completion of the Student’s academic
requirements, the delay cannot be more than six (6) months from the time
that the Student first advises the Institutional Student Affairs Office
and the ORCIP of the Student’s ability to make such a presentation. |
| 6.3 |
A decision to commercialize any
Intellectual Property shall bind the IP Creator to the procedure established
by this policy. |
| 6.4 |
In the event that any newly created
or discovered Intellectual Property is the result of the joint effort among
more than one IP Creator, the decision to commercialize may proceed with
the unanimous consent of the joint IP Creators failing which the matter
will be referred to the IP Board for a decision. |
| 6.5 |
In the case of any newly created
or discovered Intellectual Property created by someone who is not an Academic
Researcher, the decision to commercialize shall be made by that person’s
supervising Academic Researcher or the Vice-President of the relevant administrative
unit of the applicable Institution. |
| 6.6 |
In the case of any newly created
or discovered Intellectual Property created by a Student, the decision
to commercialize may proceed with the unanimous consent of: |
| (a) |
the Student; |
| (b) |
the Student’s academic supervisor; |
| (c) |
any other collaborators; and |
| (d) |
the senior officer of the applicable
Institutional Student Affairs Office. |
In the event that there is no unanimous agreement the matter shall be referred
to the IP Board for a decision.
| 6.7 |
In the event that a decision is
made not to commercialize any newly created or discovered Intellectual
Property, such Intellectual Property shall be, for the purposes of this
policy, considered to have been dedicated to the public domain from the
date of the first publication describing the Intellectual Property. |
7. Disclosure
| 7.1 |
A disclosure to the Institutions
of the creation or discovery of any new Intellectual Property shall be
made in the form established by the IP Board from time-to-time (hereinafter
the “Disclosure Form.”) The ORCIP shall provide reasonable assistance to
the IP Creator in the completion of the Disclosure Form. |
| 7.2 |
A copy of the Disclosure Form shall
be sent to the appropriate Departmental Chair. |
| 7.3 |
In some cases, an IP Creator may
wish to provide limited disclosure of the creation or discovery of any
new Intellectual Property to third parties. Such disclosure shall be permitted
only if the IP Creator has arranged for the third parties receiving such
information to have signed a non-disclosure agreement in form and substance
satisfactory to the Institutions. |
| 7.4 |
In some cases, a member of
the Institutions may wish to provide material or products (such as, without
limitation, biological or genetic samples) to third parties. Such material
or products may be transferred only if the member of the Institutions has
arranged for the third parties receiving such material or products to have
signed a material transfer agreement in form and substance satisfactory
to the Institutions |
8. Receiving Disclosures and Materials
| 8.1 |
In some cases, members of the Institutions
may wish to receive disclosure from third parties of the creation or discovery
of intellectual property of those third parties. The receipt of such disclosure
shall be permitted if the IP Creator has entered into appropriate arrangements
in form and substance satisfactory to the Institutions with the third parties
providing such disclosure. |
| 8.2 |
In some cases, members of the Institutions
may wish to receive material or products (such as, without limitation,
biological or genetic samples) from third parties. Such material or products
may be received only if the member has entered into appropriate arrangements
in form and substance satisfactory to the Institutions with the third parties
providing such materials or products. |
9. Initial Ownership of Intellectual Property
| 9.1 |
Subject to section 15.4 hereof,
the University shall be the nominal owner of all newly created or discovered
Intellectual Property arising at any of the Institutions. |
| 9.2 |
An IP Creator shall only deal with
newly created or discovered Intellectual Property in accordance with this
policy. |
| 9.3 |
Notwithstanding sections 9.1 and
9.2 hereof, certain agreements (such as grants, sponsorships, research
and affiliation agreements) have been or will be entered into by the Institutions
with third parties. Such agreements may contain provisions whereby Intellectual
Property is transferred, assigned, licensed or otherwise disposed of to
such third parties. The provisions of such agreements shall supersede this
policy: |
| (a) |
when the agreement involves the
work of a Student, when the senior officer of the applicable Institutional
Student Affairs Office has approved that the agreement shall so supersede;
and |
| (b) |
when the applicable Institutional
Vice President, and any member who is an Academic researcher who may be
affected by such agreement have approved that the agreement shall so supersede; |
failing which this policy shall continue to apply in precedence to such
agreement.
10. Retention of University Ownership Right
| 10.1 |
After a Disclosure Form has been
received by the ORCIP, a review will be conducted which will include an
assessment of the potential commercial value of the Intellectual Property. |
| 10.2 |
With respect to any Intellectual
Property, the IP Board may decide that: |
| (a) |
the Institutions are interested
in proceeding with the protection and commercialization of the intellectual
Property; or |
| (b) |
the Institutions have no further
interest in the Intellectual Property. |
| 10.3 |
In the case where the IP Board has
decided that the Institutions have no further interest in the Intellectual
Property, the Intellectual Property may: |
| (a) |
at the request of the applicable
Institution other than the University, be transferred to that Institution
on such terms and conditions as the IP Board may prescribe; or |
| (b) |
failing such an Institutional request,
and at the request of the original IP Creator, and subject to section 12,
be transferred to the IP Creator on such terms and conditions as the IP
Board may prescribe. |
11. Transfer of Institutionally-Owned Intellectual Property
| 11.1
|
An IP Creator who is an Academic
researcher may request that ownership of Intellectual Property be transferred
to the IP Creator. Such a request may only be made with respect to Intellectual
Property for which a Disclosure Form has been filed. A decision by the
IP Board on the IP Creator’s request shall be made within six (6) months
provided that the Institutions and IP Creator may agree in writing to further
extensions of this time as may be required. |
| 11.2 |
The IP Board shall not unreasonably
withhold approval of the IP Creator’s request. The IP Board’s approval
shall be subject to such reasonable terms and conditions that the IP Board
may establish at the time of such approval and subject to section 12. Such
terms and conditions shall take into account the provisions of section
14 providing for the sharing of revenues. |
| 11.3 |
No resources of the Institutions
shall be available to an IP Creator to whom Intellectual Property has been
transferred except by means of an appropriate research contract. For greater
certainty and without limitation, the IP Creator shall be solely responsible
for any accounting or reporting requirements and the costs related to any
professional advice required relating to Intellectual Property so assigned. |
12. Assignments from Institutions
In the
event that ownership of any Intellectual Property is being assigned away
from the Institutions, the IP Board shall normally include the
following terms
and conditions in any such assignment:
| (a) |
A royalty free non-exclusive perpetual
licence for non-commercial academic and research purposes for the Intellectual
Property in favour of the Institutions and all of the members of the Institutions
while working at the Institutions; |
| (b) |
The right to reasonably consent
to any further assignments or transfers of the Intellectual Property; and |
| (c) |
A Provision acknowledging that no
resources of the Institutions shall be available to further develop the
Intellectual Property without an appropriate research agreement. |
13. Commercialization of Intellectual Property
| 13.1 |
The IP Creator shall be consulted
in the commercialization by the Institutions of Intellectual Property.
Such consultation will include exploring the opportunities for further
research to be performed by the IP Creator or others at the Institutions,
the potential revenues which may arise and the payment of costs related
to patent applications and other aspects of commercializing the Intellectual
Property. |
| 13.2 |
The IP Creator shall have no responsibility
for the payment of any costs relating to the commercialization by the Institutions
of Intellectual Property. |
| 13.3 |
The actual method of commercializing
Intellectual Property shall be the determination of the IP Board. |
| 13.4 |
In the event that the IP Board determines
that the Institutions no longer wish to continue to commercialize any Intellectual
Property, the Institutions may discontinue such efforts provided that there
are no outstanding contractual commitments relating thereto, and further
provided that sections 10.3 and 12 are complied with. |
| 13.5 |
ORCIP will report periodically to
the IP Creator on the commercialization of Intellectual Property created
by the IP Creator and the revenues arising therefrom. |
14. Revenue Sharing with IP Creators
| 14.1 |
In this section, the term Gross
Revenues (when used in its capitalized form) shall mean all revenue or
other consideration generated by the commercialization of Intellectual
Property. |
| 14.2 |
In this section, the term Net Revenues
(when used in its capitalized form) shall mean Gross Revenues less: |
| (a) |
all out-of-pocket direct expenses
of the person pursuing such commercialization including any patent application
fees or fees reasonably paid to third parties for any relevant purpose;
and |
| (b) |
all deductions normally made according
to generally accepted accounting practices in Canada including an appropriate
allocation of any indirect costs or other direct costs of any of the Institutions
relating to the generation of the Intellectual Property. |
The actual determination of the components of Net Revenues in any particular
case shall be the determination of the IP Board.
| 14.3 |
With respect to any Intellectual
Property commercialized by the Institutions the IP Board shall decide that
the Net Revenues shall be paid in the following fashion: |
| (a) |
50% of Net Revenues shall
be retained by the Institutions; and |
| (b) |
50% of Net Revenues shall be paid
to the IP Creators or reinvested in further research. The actual proportion
to be paid to the IP Creators or reinvested in further research shall be
decided by the IP Board based on any representations that the IP Creator
wishes to make. |
Provided that the IP Board
may decide in the case of IP Creators that are not Academic Researchers
and at the request of the Institution or Institutions involved that some
other lesser portion of Net Revenues shall be paid to the IP Creators the
actual percentage of which shall be the sole determination of the IP Board
based on any representations that the Institution involved or the IP Creator
wishes to make.
14.4
|
With respect to any Intellectual
Property commercialized by the IP Creator, the Institutions shall normally
require that they be paid twenty-five percent (25%) of the Net Revenues
arising from the commercialization of the Intellectual Property.
The IP Board, based on any representations that the IP Creator wishes to
make, shall decide what proportion of the Net Revenues accruing to the
IP Creator shall be paid to the Institutions.
The actual percentage to be used
in a particular case shall be the decision of the IP Board and shall take
into account the nature of the Intellectual Property and its likely method
of commercialization and whether the Institutions have the potential for
generating further research contracts relating to the Intellectual Property. |
| 14.5 |
In the event that any return on
Intellectual Property that is commercialized is in the form of an equity
investment, the foregoing percentages shall be considered in determining
an equitable sharing of such equity between the Institutions and the IP
Creator. |
| 14.6 |
Any monies to be paid to an IP Creator
shall, if in excess of $10,000 per year, be reported on and paid semi-annually
and otherwise reported on and paid annually. |
| 14.7 |
Prior to payment of any monies to
an IP Creator, the Director shall ensure that a plan for the reimbursement
of costs incurred by any of the Institutions is in place. |
14.8
|
In the event that there is more
than one IP Creator for any Intellectual Property, the IP Board, after
consultation with the IP Creators, shall approve the list of IP Creators
and the division of any revenues among them which shall be commensurate
with their relative contributions to the Intellectual Property. Any dispute
relating to either the relative contributions of multiple IP Creators or
their revenue entitlement shall be decided in accordance with any applicable
existing procedure or, in the event that no such procedure exists, by the
IP Board in accordance with rules and procedures established by the IP
Board. |
15. Institutional Sharing
| 15.1 |
For the purposes of this section,
the following words shall have the following meanings: |
| (a) |
“Jointly-appointed Personnel” means
members of the Institutions who hold appointments to more than one of the
Institutions; |
| (b) |
“HHS facilities” means research
or other facilities that are clearly identified as being the responsibility
of HHS; |
| (c) |
“SJHH facilities” means research
or other facilities that are clearly identified as being the responsibility
of SJHH; and |
| (d) |
“University facilities” means research
or other facilities that are clearly identified as being the responsibility
of the University. |
| 15.2 |
The Institutions shall share the
Net Revenues arising under section 13 hereof as follows: |
| (a) |
In the case of Intellectual Property
arising from work done by someone who is a member of the University and
is not Jointly-appointed Personnel and that work does not involve the use
of HHS facilities or SJHH facilities, the University shall receive 100%
of the Institutional share; |
| (b)
|
In the case of Intellectual Property
arising from work done only in University facilities by someone who is
Jointly-appointed Personnel, the University shall receive 50% of the Institutional
share and, if the person holds only one additional appointment, the Institution
to which the person holds the additional appointment shall receive 50%
of the Institutional share or, if the person holds appointments to both
HHS and SJHH, HHS and SJHH shall each receive 25% of the Institutional
share. |
| (c) |
In the case of Intellectual
Property arising from the use of HHS facilities alone or only in combination
with University facilities, the University shall receive 50% of the Institutional
share and HHS shall receive 50% thereof; |
| (d) |
In the case of Intellectual
Property arising from the use of SJHH facilities alone or only in combination
with University facilities, the University shall receive 50% of the Institutional
share and SJHH shall receive 50% thereof; and |
| (e) |
In the case of Intellectual Property
arising from the use of facilities at both of HHS and SJHH, the University
shall receive 50% of the Institutional share, and SJHH and HHS shall each
receive 25% of the Institutional share. |
| 15.3 |
All of the costs related to the
operation of ORCIP shall be paid by the University and only applied against
the commercialization of any Intellectual Property as provided for in section
14 hereof. |
| 15.4
|
In the case of Intellectual Property
arising from the use of either SJHH facilities or HHS facilities alone
by someone who is only a member of SJHH or HHS and is not Jointly-appointed
Personnel, SJHH or HHS, as the case may be, may, on a case-by-case basis
agree with the University as represented by ORCIP that section 9.1 shall
not apply and that SJHH or HHS, as the case may be, shall be the initial
nominal owner of the Intellectual Property. |
| 15.5 |
If any dispute arises among the
Institutions either relating to any matter in this section 15 or with respect
to any other matter under this policy, the Institutions agree to work in
good faith to resolve their differences amicably. The Institutions agree
to the following series of steps in the event that they are not able to
resolve any such dispute: |
| (a) |
Initially, the Institutional Vice-Presidents
in person shall meet to attempt to resolve the issue; |
| (b) |
If the foregoing meeting fails
to resolve the issue, a meeting shall be convened including the Presidents
of the Institutions and the Chairs of the University Board of Governors
and the Board of Trustees of SJHH and the Board of Directors of HHS all
in person and without delegates to attempt to resolve the issue; |
| (c) |
If the foregoing meeting fails to
resolve the issue, the matter shall be arbitrated by a panel of three arbitrators
pursuant to the Arbitrations Act (Ontario) each Institution choosing one
of the three arbitrators. Any such arbitral decision will be final and
not subject to any further review. |
16. Quinquennial Review
This policy shall be reviewed
by the IP Board prior to January 1, 2010. The IP Board shall, as part of
such review, provide recommendations for the improvement of this policy.
Original
University Policy:
Approved by Senate: May
27, 1998
Approved by Board of Governors:
June 11, 1998
Joint Institutional Policy:
Approved by University
Senate: June 9, 2004
Approved by Board of Governors:
June 10, 2004
Approved by HHS Board
of Directors: June 22, 2004
Approved by SJHH Board
of Trustees: June 17, 2004
Contact Department: Industry
Liaison Office
MUFA - pdk
April 2010