***************
Neuroscience Poster Session






Abstract

Introduction

Materials & Methods

Results

Discussion & Conclusion

References




Discussion
Board

INABIS '98 Home Page Your Session Symposia & Poster Sessions Plenary Sessions Exhibitors' Foyer Personal Itinerary New Search

Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials With Logon Stimuli. Frequency-Specific Study


Contact Person: Javier Mata (centaudiologico@cim.es)


Results

The results we obtained in the subjective identification of intensities and therefore of thresholds in the four different used types of logon stimuli gave us different values on the basis of the studied frequency, although all them were lower than 40 dB p.e. SPL. (Table 2)

Table 2. Subjective audiometry thresholds with logon stimuli of 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz in dB p.e. SPL 

        500 Hz          1000 Hz        2000 Hz        4000 Hz

Mean    30,57           25,31          25,38          29,27
SD      3,26             4,06           4,78           4,61

The first step for the valuation of the data obtained in evoked potentials, was the same waves that we can be obtained in the recordings with click after stimulation with the different logon stimuli (Figure 2).

Fig. 2: Recording morphology at 100, 80, 60 and 40 dB p.e. SPL (from top to bottom).

As a result of these recordings, it can be clearly seen that only waves I, III and V are shown to have enough clarity and reliability, although they vary according to the wave type and to the stimulus intensity for each studied frequency (Table 3).

Table 3.  Waves identification percentage 
WAVE I
dB p.e. SPL      100        80        60         40
500 Hz           88.1%      69.7%     47.9%      8.0%
1000 Hz          90.2%      74.6%     54.5%      9.3%
2000 Hz          89.9%      79.8%     65.6%      6.1%
4000 Hz          91.0%      80.5%     66.8%      8.0%
WAVE III
dB p.e. SPL      100        80        60         40
500 Hz           85.2%      68.4%     51.3%      9.1%
1000 Hz          87.8%      73.5%     55.6%      11.5%
2000 Hz          93.0%      75.0%     60.2%      13.6%
4000 Hz          94.5%      75.6%     65.2%      34.7%
WAVE V
dB p.e. SPL      100        80        60         40
500 Hz           93.6%      91.7%     90.0%      88.9%
1000 Hz          95.6%      95.7%     92.0%      89.1%
2000 Hz          98.2%      97.8%     94.0%      93.5%
4000 Hz          99.6%      98.5%     98.0%      97.1%
Regarding the morphology of these recordings, there will not to be significant variations in relations to the frequency, although in 4 kHz registers, we can see that the waves II and IV often appear with intensity of 100 dB p.e. SPL.

The results we obtained for latencies showed an inverse increment in proportion to the studied frequency. (Table 4)

Table 4. Latencies results (msec.)	
WAVE I
dB p.e. SPL	100		80		60		
		Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD
500 Hz	3.18	0.58	3.60	0.44	4.43	0.56	
1000 Hz	2.49	0.31	2.94	0.35	3.73	0.38
2000 Hz	2.10	0.20	2.68	0.21	3.22	0.22
4000 Hz	1.77	0.10	2.16	0.16	2.72	0.15
WAVE III
dB p.e. SPL	100		80		60		40
		Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD
500 Hz	5.03	0.44	5.66	0.43	6.27	0.33	
1000 Hz	4.71	0.28	5.28	0.36	5.77	0.51
2000 Hz	4.21	0.18	4.57	0.17	5.08	0.17
4000 Hz	3.83	0.19	4.26	0.22	4.64	0.25	5.37	0.41
WAVE V
dB p.e. SPL	100		80		60		40
		Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD
500 Hz	7.13	0.36	7.90	0.43	8.70	0.45	10.6	0.28	
1000 Hz	6.58	0.28	7.07	0.33	7.73	0.48	8.50	0.38
2000 Hz	6.05	0.25	6.72	0.30	7.49	0.27	8.24	0.29	
4000 Hz	5.67	0.14	6.16	0.17	6.89	0.19	7.51	0.31
Apart from all the obtained data regarding latencies, we have also made an assessment of these data for interlatencies I-III, I-V and III-V for each one of the frequencies with 100 dB p.e. SPL (Table 5).
 
Table 5. Interlatencies results at 100 dB p.e. SPL (msec.)
500 Hz	
                I-III      III-V      I-V
L. inf.         1.95       1.50       3.74	
L. sup.         2.68       2.10       4.49
Mean            2.27       1.81       4.02
SD              0.25       0.22       0.28

1000 Hz	

                I-III      III-V      I-V
L. inf.         1.98       1.34       3.60	
L. sup.         2.52       2.20       4.28
Mean            2.18       1.85       3.95
SD              0.16       0.20       0.22

2.000 Hz	
               I-III       III-V      I-V
L. inf.        1.95        1.44       3.60
L. sup.        2.39        2.11       4.43
Mean           2.15        1.83       4.02
SD             0.14        0.18       0.20

4.000 Hz	
               I-III       III-V      I-V
L. inf.        1.86        1.41       3.76	
L. sup.        2.35        2.12       4.30
Mean           2.08        1.73       3.96
SD             0.12        0.21       0.18
Finally, we have performed a comparative study (with 100 dB p.e SPL) of the data obtained by means of logon and click, and it has been graphically illustrated. In this graphic study, we consider the "click" as a reference value both in latency values (Figure 3, where some growing deviations in latency can be observed, reaching with 500 Hz an increment from 1 to 1,5 msec.)

Fig. 3: Comparative graph of differential latencies between logon and click to 100 dB p.e. SPL).

and interlatency values (Figure 4, where the maximum difference oscillates from +0,22 msec. To -0,14 msec.).

Fig. 4. Differential results of interlatencies between logon and click to 100 dB p.e. SPL).

Back to the top.


<= Materials & Methods RESULTS Discussion & Conclussions =>

| Discussion Board | Next Page | Your Poster Session |
Mata, J; Ruiz Carmona, E; (1998). Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials With Logon Stimuli. Frequency-Specific Study. Presented at INABIS '98 - 5th Internet World Congress on Biomedical Sciences at McMaster University, Canada, Dec 7-16th. Available at URL http://www.mcmaster.ca/inabis98/neuroscience/mata0857/index.html
© 1998 Author(s) Hold Copyright