***************
Keynote Address






Abstract

The Review of Scientific Manuscripts

The Review of Scientific Manuscripts Can Be Wholly Electronic

Why Do Authors Select Certain Journals for Their Best Papers?

Reviewers Are the Achilles Heel of the Review Process.

Conclusion: To Improve Quality and Speed of Review Requires Rewards for Reviewers




Discussion
Board

INABIS '98 Home Page Your Session Symposia & Poster Sessions Plenary Sessions Exhibitors' Foyer Personal Itinerary New Search

Human Reviewers: The Achilles Heel of Scientific Journals in a Digital Era

Bloom, Floyd (Department of Neuropharmacology, The Scripps Research Institute, USA)

Contact Person: Floyd Bloom (fbloom@SCRIPPS.EDU)


Abstract

The World Wide Web and other forms of digital communication have lead some to predict the demise of printed journals. In my experience, scientific articles can be more efficiently reviewed and edited by digital document sharing. High quality print journals will remain the preferred scholarly venue for authors's best works, but only if the performance of human reviewers can be improved and appropriately rewarded.

Back to the top.
| Discussion Board | Next Page


Bloom, Floyd; (1998). Human Reviewers: The Achilles Heel of Scientific Journals in a Digital Era . Presented at INABIS '98 - 5th Internet World Congress on Biomedical Sciences at McMaster University, Canada, Dec 7-16th. Keynote Address. Available at URL http://www.mcmaster.ca/inabis98/keynote/bloom/index.html
© 1998 Author(s) Hold Copyright